Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLapin, Hayimen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlson, Kenneth A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-06-04T05:26:19Z
dc.date.available2004-06-04T05:26:19Z
dc.date.issued2004-04-26en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/1378
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the viability of the Farrer theory of how The Gospel According to Luke was written in light of the influential criticisms of that theory by F.G. Downing. Downing argues that on Farrer's theory, Luke has departed from known compositional procedures of Graeco-Roman authors in deserting the common witness of his sources, in picking out Matthew's additions to Mark from Matthew's gospel to use in his own work, and in removing the Markan parallels from the Matthean additions that he has picked out. This thesis will argue to the contrary that in following one of his sources at a time rather than trying to follow both simultaneously, and in using material from his second (Matthean) source to supplement his main (Markan) source, Farrer's Luke appears to be following accepted ancient compositional methods, and that he has no demonstrable tendency to remove Markan parallels from his use of Matthew.en_US
dc.format.extent489509 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleHow Luke Was Writtenen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHistoryen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledHistory, Ancienten_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledReligion, Biblical Studiesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsynoptic problemen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledancient compositionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledgospelsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledLukeen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledFarreren_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledDowningen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record