Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMilke, James Aen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBryan, John Len_US
dc.contributor.advisorNotarianni, Kathy Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorKuligowski, Erica Dawnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-31T19:50:29Z
dc.date.available2004-05-31T19:50:29Z
dc.date.issued2003-12-15en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/114
dc.description.abstractThis work emphasizes the importance for egress model users to choose a model for each project with the appropriate input features and simulation capabilities. This report also gives model users a mechanism for choosing the appropriate model by providing a detailed egress model review (Chapter 2). Specifically this report focuses on the ability of two egress models, EXIT89 and Simulex, to simulate a high-rise hotel building evacuation. When EXIT89 and Simulex are used to 1) simulate the same design scenarios and 2) perform a bounding analysis of the hotel building, significant differences in egress times were identified. EXIT89's evacuation times were found to be 25-40% lower than Simulex for the design scenarios, attributed to differences in unimpeded speeds, movement algorithms, methods of simulating slow occupants, density in the stairs, and stair configuration input between the models. For the bounding analysis, EXIT89 produced maximum evacuation times 30-40% lower than Simulex.en_US
dc.format.extent2520528 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleThe Evaluation of a Performance-Based Design Process for a Hotel Building: The Comparison of Two Egress Modelsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFire Protection Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEngineering, Generalen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record