INTERPRETING AMERICA’S FIRST GRECIAN STYLE HOUSE: THE ARCHITECTURAL LEGACY OF GEORGE WASHINGTON PARKE CUSTIS AND GEORGE HADFIELD

View/ Open
Date
2010-05Author
Rudy, William George
Advisor
Linebaugh, Donald
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Arlington House, located within Arlington National Cemetery and now managed by the National Park Service, was built in a three phase, sixteen-year construction sequence (1802-1818), and is considered the first American example of adapting the principles of Grecian style architecture to a domestic building. Despite its historic designation as a National Monument in 1925, the interpretation at Arlington House does not adequately portray the significance of its early history and architecture nor its contribution to the development of the nation’s capital. Federal legislation requires the site interpretation to portray the period of April 1861, when its last occupants, General Robert E. Lee and his family, departed following Virginia’s secession from the Union. The emphasis on Lee’s tenancy overshadows the early
history of Arlington House and the contributions of its owner, George Washington Parke Custis, and architect, George Hadfield.
By providing a comprehensive historical overview of the development of Arlington House, this research is intended to: (1) outline the major factors that shaped its history to promote a broader understanding of its national significance as a historic site; and (2) promote a greater appreciation of architect George Hadfield’s professional accomplishments and his contribution towards developing an American vernacular form of residential Greek Revival architecture. This paper will argue for a more broadly representative site interpretation that expands the current interpretation by placing greater emphasis on the significance of its early history and architectural design. Identifying the factors that have shaped the historical and architectural significance of Arlington House is critical in advocating for a comprehensive approach to its public site interpretation. Ultimately, this research questions the relevancy of the existing federal legislation that mandates the interpretation while advocating a policy change that seeks to incorporate a broader approach to how site interpretation is presented at house museums managed by the National Park Service.
Notes
This document has had referenced material removed in respect for the owner's copyright. A complete version of this document, which includes said referenced material, resides in the University of Maryland, College Park's library collection. Masters final project submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Historic Preservation. HISP 710/711 Spring 2010.
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A functional SNP in the promoter of the SERPINH1 gene increases risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes in African Americans
Wang, Hongyan; Parry, Samuel; Macones, George; Sammel, Mary D.; Kuivaniemi, Helena; Tromp, Gerard; Argyropoulos, George; Halder, Indrani; Shriver, Mark D.; Romero, Roberto; Strauss, Jerome F., III (2006)Prematurity is more prevalent in African Americans than in European Americans. We investigated the contribution of a functional SNP in the promoter of the SERPINH1 gene, enriched among those of African ancestry, to preterm ... -
What If We Were Equal? A Comparison Of The Black-White Mortality Gap In 1960 And 2000
Satcher, David; Fryer, George E., Jr.; McCann, Jessica; Troutman, Adewale; Woolf, Steven H.; Rust, George (2005)The United States has made progress in decreasing the black-white gap in civil rights, housing, education, and income since 1960, but health inequalities persist. We examined trends in black-white standardized mortality ... -
The Health Impact of Resolving Racial Disparities: An Analysis of US Mortality Data
Woolf, Steven H.; Johnson, Robert E.; Fryer, George E., Jr; Rust, George; Satcher, David (2004)The US health system spends far more on the “technology” of care (e.g., drugs, devices) than on achieving equity in its delivery. For 1991 to 2000, we contrasted the number of lives saved by medical advances with the number ...