UMD Theses and Dissertations

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/3

New submissions to the thesis/dissertation collections are added automatically as they are received from the Graduate School. Currently, the Graduate School deposits all theses and dissertations from a given semester after the official graduation date. This means that there may be up to a 4 month delay in the appearance of a given thesis/dissertation in DRUM.

More information is available at Theses and Dissertations at University of Maryland Libraries.

Browse

Filters

2010 - 20112

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.Medical Imaging and Radiology

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Parallel Computation of Nonrigid Image Registration
    (2011) Leung, Frances Kimpik; Shekhar, Raj; Electrical Engineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    Automatic intensity-based nonrigid image registration brings significant impact in medical applications such as multimodality fusion of images, serial comparison for monitoring disease progression or regression, and minimally invasive image-guided interventions. However, due to memory and compute intensive nature of the operations, intensity-based image registration has remained too slow to be practical for clinical adoption, with its use limited primarily to as a pre-operative too. Efficient registration methods can lead to new possibilities for development of improved and interactive intraoperative tools and capabilities. In this thesis, we propose an efficient parallel implementation for intensity-based three-dimensional nonrigid image registration on a commodity graphics processing unit. Optimization techniques are developed to accelerate the compute-intensive mutual information computation. The study is performed on the hierarchical volume subdivision-based algorithm, which is inherently faster than other nonrigid registration algorithms and structurally well-suited for data-parallel computation platforms. The proposed implementation achieves more than 50-fold runtime improvement over a standard implementation on a CPU. The execution time of nonrigid image registration is reduced from hours to minutes while retaining the same level of registration accuracy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A dual modality, DCE-MRI and x-ray, physical phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast imaging protocols
    (2010) Freed, Melanie; Badano, Aldo; Bioengineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    The current clinical standard for breast cancer screening is mammography. However, this technique has a low sensitivity which results in missed cancers. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has recently emerged as a promising technique for breast cancer diagnosis and has been reported as being superior to mammography for screening of high-risk women and evaluation of extent of disease. At the same time, low and variable specificity has been documented in the literature as well as a rising number of mastectomies possibly due to the increasing use of DCE-MRI. In this study, we developed and characterized a dual-modality, x-ray and DCE-MRI, anthropomorphic breast phantom for the quantitative assessment of breast imaging protocols. X-ray properties of the phantom were quantitatively compared with patient data, including attenuation coefficients, which matched human values to within the measurement error, and tissue structure using spatial covariance matrices of image data, which were found to be similar in size to patient data. Simulations of the phantom scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) were produced and experimentally validated then compared with published SPR predictions for homogeneous phantoms. SPR values were as high as 85% in some areas and were heavily influenced by the heterogeneous tissue structure. MRI properties of the phantom, T1 and T2 relaxation values and tissue structure, were also quantitatively compared with patient data and found to match within two error bars. Finally, a dynamic lesion that mimics lesion border shape and washout curve shape was included in the phantom. High spatial and temporal resolution x-ray measurements of the washout curve shape were performed to determine the true contrast agent concentration as a function of time. DCE-MRI phantom measurements using a clinical imaging protocol were compared against the x-ray truth measurements. MRI signal intensity curves were shown to be less specific to lesion type than the x-ray derived contrast agent concentration curves. This phantom allows, for the first time, for quantitative evaluation of and direct comparisons between x-ray and MRI breast imaging modalities in the context of lesion detection and characterization.