Climate

AND SOCIAL STRESS

Implications for Security Analysis

Committee on Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on
Social and Political Stresses

John D. Steinbruner, Paul C. Stern, and Jo L. Husbands, Editors

Board on Environmental Change and Society

Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
                         OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Washington, D.C.

www.nap.edu



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page R1
Committee on Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Social and Political Stresses John D. Steinbruner, Paul C. Stern, and Jo L. Husbands, Editors Board on Environmental Change and Society Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education

OCR for page R1
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS   500 Fifth Street, NW   Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern- ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer- ing, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropri- ate balance. This study was supported by the U.S. intelligence community. Any opinions, find- ings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-27856-0 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-27856-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data are available from the Library of Congress. Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu. Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Suggested Citation: National Research Council. (2013). Climate and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis. Committee on Assessing the Impacts of Climate ­ Change on Social and Political Stresses, J.D. Steinbruner, P.C. Stern, and J.L. H ­ usbands, Eds. Board on Environmental Change and Society, Division of ­ ehavioral B and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

OCR for page R1
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Acad- emy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding en- gineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineer- ing programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is presi- dent of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Insti- tute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sci- ences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Coun- cil is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. www.national-academies.org

OCR for page R1

OCR for page R1
COMMITTEE ON ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON SOCIAL AND POLITICAL STRESSES JOHN D. STEINBRUNER (Chair), Professor of Public Policy, University of Maryland; Director, Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland OTIS B. BROWN, Director, Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites, North Carolina State University ANTONIO J. BUSALACCHI, JR., Director, Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland; Professor, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science DAVID EASTERLING, Chief, Scientific Services Division, National Climatic Data Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Asheville, NC KRISTIE L. EBI, Consulting Professor, Department of Medicine, Stanford University THOMAS FINGAR, Oksenberg–Rohlen Distinguished Fellow and Senior Scholar, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University LEON FUERTH, Distinguished Research Fellow, National Defense University; Research Professor of International Affairs, George Washington University; Founder and Director, Project on Forward Engagement  SHERRI GOODMAN, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, CNA Analysis and Solutions, Alexandria, VA; Executive Director, CNA Military Advisory Board ROBIN LEICHENKO, Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Rutgers University ROBERT J. LEMPERT, Director, Frederick S. Pardee Center for Longer Range Global Policy and the Future Human Condition, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA MARC LEVY, Deputy Director, Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Earth Institute, Columbia University DAVID LOBELL, Assistant Professor, Environmental Earth System Science, Stanford University; Center Fellow, Program on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University RICHARD STUART OLSON, Director of Extreme Event Research and Professor, Department of Politics and International Relations, Florida International University RICHARD L. SMITH, Director, Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC v

OCR for page R1
PAUL C. STERN, Study Director JO L. HUSBANDS, Scholar ALICIA JARAMILLO-UNDERWOOD, Senior Program Assistant MARY ANN KASPER, Senior Program Assistant vi

OCR for page R1
BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AND SOCIETY RICHARD H. MOSS (Chair), Senior Staff Scientist, Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, MD ARUN AGRAWAL, Research Associate Dean, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor JOSEPH ARVAI, Svare Chair in Applied Decision Research, University of Calgary ANTHONY BEBBINGTON, Higgins Professor of Environment and Society, Director of the Graduate School of Geography, Clark University WILLIAM CHANDLER, President, Transition Energy, Annapolis, MD F. STUART CHAPIN, III, Professor, University of Alaska–Fairbanks RUTH DEFRIES, Denning Professor of Sustainable Development, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University KRISTIE L. EBI, Consulting Professor, Department of Medicine, Stanford University MARIA CARMEN LEMOS, Associate Professor, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor DENNIS OJIMA, Senior Research Scientist, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University JONATHAN OVERPECK, Co-Director, Institute of the Environment, University of Arizona STEPHEN POLASKY, Professor of Ecological/Environmental Economics, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota J. TIMMONS ROBERTS, Director, Center for Environmental Studies, Professor of Sociology and Environmental Studies, Center for Environmental Studies, Brown University JAMES L. SWEENEY, Professor of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University GARY W. YOHE, Woodhouse/Sysco Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Wesleyan University MEREDITH A. LANE, Board Director PAUL C. STERN, Senior Scholar MARY ANN KASPER, Senior Program Assistant vii

OCR for page R1

OCR for page R1
Preface C ore features of the climate change situation are known with con- fidence. The greenhouse effect associated with the carbon dioxide molecule has been measured, as has the dwell time of that molecule and its concentration in the atmosphere. We also know that the rate at which carbon dioxide is currently being added to the atmosphere sub- stantially exceeds the natural rate that prevailed before the rise of human s ­ ocieties. That means that a large and unprecedentedly rapid thermal im- pulse is being imparted to the earth’s ecology that will have to be balanced in some fashion. We know beyond reasonable doubt that the consequences will be extensive. We do not, however, know the timing, magnitude, or character of those consequences with sufficient precision to make predic- tions that meet scientific standards of confidence. In principle the thermal impulse could be mitigated to a degree that would presumably preserve the current operating conditions of human societies, but the global effort required to do that is not being undertaken and cannot be presumed. As a practical matter, that means that significant burdens of adaptation will be imposed on all societies and that unusually severe climate perturbations will be encountered in some parts of the world over the next decade with increasing frequency and severity thereafter. There is a compelling reason to presume that specific failures of adaptation will occur with consequences more severe than any yet experienced, severe enough to compel more extensive international engagement than has yet been anticipated or organized. This report has been prepared at the request of the U.S. intelligence community with these circumstances in mind. It summarizes what is cur- ix

OCR for page R1
x PREFACE rently known about the security effects of climate perturbations, admitting the inherent complexities and the very considerable uncertainties involved. But under the presumption that these effects will be of increasing signifi- cance, it outlines the monitoring activities that the intelligence community should be developing in support of improved anticipation, more effective prevention efforts, and more decisive emergency reaction when that be- comes necessary. The report was prepared by the members of the committee, all of whom helped shape the assessment presented and many of whom drafted elements of the text. The burden of constructing a coherent whole from individual contributions fell primarily to Paul Stern and Jo Husbands as the principal editors of the report. Alicia Jaramillo-Underwood and Mary Ann Kasper provided essential administrative support. National Research Council Fel- low Andrei Israel and intern Zafar Imran provided research support and assisted in the preparation of parts of the text. I am personally grateful for all of these contributions. John D. Steinbruner, Chair Committee on Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Social and Political Stresses

OCR for page R1
Acknowledgments T his report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Academies’ Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this re- port: Marc F. Bellemare, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University; Andrew Brown, Jr., Innovation and Technology Office, Delphi Corpora- tion, Troy, Michigan; Jared L. Cohon, Office of the President, Carnegie Mellon University; Geoff Dabelko, Environmental Change and Security Program, Woodrow Wilson Center; Delores M. Etter, Caruth Institute for Engineering Education, Southern Methodist University; John Gannon, BAE Systems, Arlington, Virginia; James R. Johnson, (retired) Minnesota Min- ing and Manufacturing Company, Oak Park Heights, Minnesota; John E. Kutzbach, Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison; Monty G. Marshall, Center for Global Policy, George Mason University and Center for Systemic Peace, Societal-Systems Research, Inc.; Dennis Ojima, Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University; Reto Ruedy, NASA Goddard In- stitute for Space Studies; and Philip A. Schrodt, Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University. xi

OCR for page R1
xii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Warren M. Washington, Climate Change Research Section, Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, and Thomas J. Wilbanks, En- vironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Appointed by the National Academies, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

OCR for page R1
Contents Summary 1 1 Climate Change as a National Security Concern 15 Potential Climate–Security Connections, 17 Increasing Risks of Disruptive Climate Events, 21 The Focus of This Study, 30 Structure of the Report, 33 2 Climate Change, Vulnerability, and National Security: A Conceptual Framework 35 Connections Between Climate Events and National Security, 36 Implications of the Conceptual Framework, 43 Strategies for Security Analysis, 48 3 Potentially Disruptive Climate Events 53 The Science of Climate Projection, 54 Abrupt Climate Change, 58 Single Extreme Events, 61 Clusters of Extreme Events, 68 Sequences of Events, 70 Global System Shocks, 71 Surprises Arising from Poorly Resolved Climate Dynamics, 72 Conclusions and Recommendations, 73 xiii

OCR for page R1
xiv CONTENTS 4 How Climate Events Can Lead to Social and Political Stresses 75 Local and Distant Effects, 76 Exposures, 82 Susceptibility to Harm from Climate Events, 84 Coping, Response, and Recovery, 87 Conclusions and Recommendations, 91 5 Climate Events and National Security Outcomes 97 Water, Food, and Health Security, 98 Humanitarian Crises, 111 Disruptive Migration, 112 Severe Political Instability and State Failure, 117 Interstate and Intrastate Conflict and Violence, 125 Conclusions and Recommendations, 134 6 Methods for Assessing National Security Threats 139 What Should Be Monitored and Why, 140 Challenges of Monitoring, 143 A Strategy for Monitoring, 153 An Approach to Anticipating Risks, 158 References 161 Appendixes A Committee Member and Staff Biographies 179 B Briefings Received by the Committee 187 C Method for Developing Figure 3-1 189 D Statistical Methods for Assessing Probabilities of Extreme Events 193 E Foundations for Monitoring Climate–Security Connections 203