Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (DRUM)  >
College of Arts & Humanities  >
Linguistics  >
Linguistics Research Works 

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Quantification and Second-Order Monadicity
Authors: Pietroski, Paul
Type: Article
Keywords: semantics
Issue Date: 2003
Publisher: Blackwell
Citation: Philosophical Perspectives 17: 259-298, 2003
Abstract: The first part of this paper reviews some developments regarding the apparent mismatch between the logical and grammatical forms of quantificational constructions like 'Pat kicked every bottle'. I suggest that (even given quantifier-raising) many current theories still posit an undesirable mismatch. But all is well if we can treat determiners (words like 'every', 'no', and 'most') as second-order monadic predicates without treating them as predicates satisfied by ordered pairs of sets. Drawing on George Boolos's construal of second-order quantification as plural quantification, I argue that we can and should view determiners as predicates satisfied (plurally) by ordered pairs each of which associates an entity with a truth-value (t or f). The idea is 'every' is satisfied by some pairs iff every one of them associates its entity with t. It turns out that this provides a kind of explanation for the "conservativity" of determiners. And it lets us say that concatenation signifies predicate-conjunction even in phrases like 'every bottle' and 'no brown dog'.
Appears in Collections:Linguistics Research Works
Philosophy Research Works

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormatNo. of Downloads
QSOM.pdf213.08 kBAdobe PDF1260View/Open

All items in DRUM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
Please send us your comments