Theses and Dissertations from UMD >
UMD Theses and Dissertations >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Class Advantage: Social Class and Knowledge Production In Classrooms Under The New Accountability|
|Authors: ||Aaron, Philbert|
|Advisors: ||Selden, Steven|
|Department/Program: ||Education Policy, and Leadership|
|Sponsors: ||Digital Repository at the University of Maryland|
University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
|Keywords: ||Education, Curriculum and Instruction (0727)|
Education, Reading (0535)
Education, Sociology of (0340)
Basil Bernstein; Social Class; Accountability; No Child Left Behind Act of 2001; Maryland; Knowledge Production
|Issue Date: ||20-Apr-2005|
Title of Dissertation: CLASS ADVANTAGE: SOCIAL CLASS AND
KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN
ELEMENTARY CLASSROOMS UNDER THE
Philbert Aaron, Doctor of Philosophy, 2005
Dissertation directed by: Professor Steven Selden
Department of Education Policy and Leadership
This study interrogates the relationship between social class and academic achievement. It examines the ways in which social class and the new accountability policy influence teachers' and students' co-production of knowledge in the elementary school classroom. The study analyzes student and teacher talk in two elementary school reading classrooms in a mid-Atlantic state. The first school is categorized as middle-class, having less than 5% of its student body receiving Free and Reduced-price Meals (FARMs). The second is classified as working-class, having more than 60% of its students receiving FARMs.
The study draws upon the work of the British sociolinguist, Basil Bernstein. Bernstein's theory of symbolic control provides both theoretical base and method for the inquiry. Using Bernstein's frameworks for classification and framing, language data on teacher-student pedagogical interaction was collected by note-taking during classroom observation in the Spring of 2004. These data were analyzed using a priori codes, including 'visible' (explicit or traditional) and 'invisible' (implicit or constructivist) practice.
The study finds that pedagogical practice in the middle class school incorporated both visible (traditional) and invisible (constructivist) practices, while pedagogy in the working class school is of the purely visible type. In addition, the middle class school also achieves a faster pace of learning than does the working class school. Faster pace is indicated by syntactical (elaborated) text whereas in the working class school a lexical (brief utterances) text is produced.
The study concludes that social class has unanticipated consequences for academic achievement under the new accountability. By providing identical policy tools to local schools, irrespective of student class location, the new accountability promotes a visible (traditional) pedagogy. Differences in family cultural, social, and economic capital mean that the working class school does not meet the social assumptions of a visible pedagogy and these differences manifest themselves in differentials in achievement.|
|Appears in Collections:||UMD Theses and Dissertations|
Teaching, Learning, Policy & Leadership Theses and Dissertations
All items in DRUM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.